Legal Opinion

H. P. Lambert Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 13, 1940No. 4871; Entry No. 290, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals to rappraisement listed in schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the proper dutiable *795values of canned tuna fish imported from Japan, and entered at the port of Boston between June 1, 1937, and July 9, 1938.

At the trial of these cases at Boston on May 18, 1939, counsel for the respective parties agreed as follows:

Mr. Kavanagh. * * * I believe Mr. FitzGibbon will agree to Mr. Hoshi-moto’s testimony taken at Providence in Reap. No. 120340-A, etc., being made a part of the record here.

Mr. FitzGibbon. No objection.

Judge Tilson. So ordered.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API