Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
In the instant motion for reconsideration, Defendant American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”) asks the Court to reconsider two aspects of the Court’s September 28, 2012 ruling, 893 F.Supp.2d 686 (D.N.J.2012), which were both in favor of Plaintiff Munich Reinsurance America Inc. (“Munich”). ANICO contends: (a) that the Court failed to fully consider the applicability of Article XVI of the parties’ 2000 and 2001 agreements in connection with ANICO’s cross-motion for summary judgment on its untimely claim submission defense; and (b) with respect to Article X…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Thompson Street Capital Partners IV, L.P., in its Capacity as Members' Representative v. Sonova United States Hearing Instruments, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025