Legal Opinion

Anaheim Gardens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 4, 2016No. 93-655CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deposition Discovery; Protective Order; RCFC 26(b); RCFC 26(c)(1); RCFC 30(b)(6)

OPINION and ORDER

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

This is a temporary regulatory takings case. Plaintiffs are owners of low-income housing who claim a taking of their contractual right to prepay government-insured mortgages on their respective housing projects, and thus to terminate certain governmental restrictions on rents and other aspects of the properties’ use. Defendant is the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD, the government, or defendant).

Presently before the court is defendant’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ANAHEIM GARDENS v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. ANAHEIM GARDENS v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API