Legal Opinion

Anaheim Gardens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 25, 2018No. 93-655Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 93-655C (E-Filed: September 25, 2018) ) Regulatory Takings Claims; Motion ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., ) for Summary Judgment, RCFC 56; ) Right to Pre-Pay Mortgages on Plaintiffs, ) Subsidized Low-Income Housing ) Developments; No Reasonable v. ) Investment-Backed Expectation in a ) Property Right Destroyed Prior to THE UNITED STATES, ) Purchase of Property; Insufficient ) Evidence of Economic Impact to Defendant. ) Support a Permanent Regulatory ) Taking. Harry J. Kelly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. A. Bondurant Eley, Senior Trial Counsel, with…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API