Legal Opinion

Anaheim Gardens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 24, 2018No. 93-655Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 93-655C (E-Filed: July 24, 2018) ) ANAHEIM GARDENS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Motion In Limine; Exclusion of ) Evidence that Allegedly Contradicts v. ) Deposition Testimony of RCFC ) 30(b)(6) Witness. THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Harry J. Kelly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Shari A. Rose, A. Bondurant Ely, Isaac B. Rosenberg, and Kara M. Westercamp, with whom were Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Director, Franklin E. White, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rainey v. American Forest and Paper Ass'n, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. Vehicle Market Research, Inc. v. Mitchell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. R & B Appliance Parts, Inc. v. Amana Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API