Markel International Insurance v. Westchester Fire Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Petitioners Markel International Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London move to compel separate arbitration proceedings and stay respondent’s arbitration demand. Respondent Westchester Fire Insurance Company cross-moves to commence arbitration to determine the scope of arbitration. These motions are decided without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 78. Petitioners’ motion to compel arbitration and stay respondent’s arbitration demand is denied. Respondent’s cross-motion to compel arbitration is granted.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Curley v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Markel Intern. Ins. Co. v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INS.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006