Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Schriver

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 27, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHERNE, Judge.

The issue at bar is whether, under Tennessee law, a futures contract made through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange constitutes an illegal gaming transaction.

I

The defendant Schriver, through the plaintiff Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, entered into certain sell order agreements for 42 carloads (contracts of 36,000 pounds each) of February, 1975 pork bellies, which transactions began on September 23, 1974 and were concluded September 26, 1974. As a result of these contracts and the action of the market in the commodity, the defendant allegedly lost $40,620.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shepard & Gluck v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Easterly v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Palmer v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. LambertDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
  5. Cloud Cotton Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LTV Federal Credit Union v. UMIC Government Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  2. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. ConawayDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API