Legal Opinion
LTV Federal Credit Union v. UMIC Government Securities, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 1, 1981No. Civ. A. CA-3-80-0795-G, CA-3-80-1094-GPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
These consolidated actions arise out of the breach of a standby commitment agreement (“Standby Commitment”) between LTV Federal Credit Union (“LTV”) and UMIC Government Securities, Inc. (“UMIC”). LTV seeks a declaratory judgment that the Standby Commitment is unenforceable. UMIC and Banco de la Nación Argentina (“Banco”) seek damages of $1,146,250, pre-judgment interest, and their reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs. This Opinion sets forth this court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a).
I
On June 26,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,512 Richard N. Abrams v. Oppenheimer Government Securities, Inc. And James ZurekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Board Of Trade Of The City Of Chicago v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Board Of Trade Of The City Of Chicago v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Plains Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.