Legal Opinion
Kuhk v. Playstudios Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 18, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00460Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 TYLER KUHK, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00460-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS v. AND COMPEL ARBITRATION 13 PLAYSTUDIOS INC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and to Compel 18 Arbitration. Dkt. No. 4. Having considered Plaintiff’s Response (Dkt. No. 9), Defendant’s Reply 19 (Dkt. No. 11), Defendant’s supplemental authority (Dkt. No. 12), and the relevant record, and 20 finding oral argument unnecessary, see LCR 7(b)(4), the Court DENIES…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.