Legal Opinion

Watts v. Copeland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1933No. 13693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

On December 31, 1924, a default judgment in the sum of $1,987.08 was obtained by the Daurens Trust Company against E. W. Copeland and Mrs. Lizzie IT. Copeland, his wife, in an action on two promissory notes, and was duly entered in the office of the Clerk of Court for Laurens County on January 1, 1925. The trust company on November 20, 1926, assigned this judgment to one J. D. Watts as collateral security for the payment of a debt which it owed him. On May 31, 1928, the Copelands made a motion in the original cause to set aside the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ward v. HaggardIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Vila v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  4. Commonwealth v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Laurens Trust Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Effel v. McGarry, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Tate v. WernerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API