Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hamlin v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1993No. 92-2388PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This controversy was generated by the commission’s denial of claimant’s workers’ compensation claim. No one disputes that the commission’s decision involves claimant’s “right to participate” in the workers’ compensation program and is, therefore, appealable. Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d 1175. Underlying this dispute is a single question: Has claimant’s time for appeal to the common pleas court run?

Claimant’s death moots that inquiry. Admittedly, the procedural issue before this court was initiated by the employer, and, as a general rule, an employee’s death does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Seabloom Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ratliff v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicholson v. Copperweld Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Wells v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (6-1-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Byk v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State ex rel. White v. Internatl. House of PancakesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Hook v. City of SpringfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API