Legal Opinion
State v. Noble
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1989No. TC 86C-22355; CA A47047; SC S35807PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in imposing an ORS 144.110 minimum sentence on a remanded juvenile.
Because the Board of Parole overrode the minimum sentence, this case now is moot.1 We therefore dismiss the . petition for review.
Petition for review dismissed.
Defendant has moved for consideration of the issue posed by the petition for review even though the issue may be moot. The motion is denied.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Burdge v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Wells v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.