Catterall v. Pulis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Pulis began this action seeking injunction to restrain Catterall from interfering and preventing plaintiff’s use of a roadway along the north line of defendant’s land. This appeal is from a judgment granting injunctive relief to plaintiff as sought.
The situation of the parties is disclosed by the plat following:
Pulis alleged himself to he the owner of the W. ½ of the W. ½ of the S. E. ¼, lying east of the C., R. I. & P. Ry., of section 3, twp. 6N., range 7W., I. M., on which he now lives.
Defendant Catterall owns the N. ½ of S. W. ¼ of section 3, twp. 6N., range 7W., I. M.
Pulis alleged that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Woodhull v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Dawson v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Prentice v. McKayMontana Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Irion v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Murduck v. City of BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Frater Oklahoma Realty Corp. v. ALLEN LAUHON HDWE. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Von Rohr v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gorman v. OvermyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.