Legal Opinion
State v. Hansen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1931No. 28,629PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant appeals from the order denying his. motion to dismiss because of laches the prosecution of a bastardy proceeding.
In 1926 the defendant ivas adjudged in the district court of Hennepin county to be the father of an illegitimate child. On December 16, 1927, there was a reversal. State v. Hansen, 173 Minn. 158, 217 N. W. 146. The result was a new trial. In the early part of 1931 the county attorney indicated a definite purpose to retry the case. The defendant moved to dismiss the proceeding because of laches in prosecution. The motion was denied. He appeals from the order denying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pillsbury v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. RiebelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Fitzgibbins v. YennieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. School District No. 74 v. County of LincolnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Independent School District No. 84 v. RittmillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Dady v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945