Legal Opinion

Pillsbury v. Foley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1895No. Nos. 9448—(202)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kerr, J., denying a motion to dismiss the action. The ground of motion was that the action was for the determination of a right or interest in and injuries to real estate situate in Benton and Morrison counties, and that the district court for Ramsey county had no jurisdiction of the action.

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the action. The order is not appealable.

Appeal dismissed.

2Cited by11 opinions

Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KaufertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
Kokesh v. City of HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
Krafve v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.