Legal Opinion
City of San Mateo v. Hardy
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1944No. Civ. 12650PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying an injunction to restrain defendant from violation of a municipal zoning ordinance and requiring him to remove certain alterations in a building which were made in violation of the ordinance.
On June 7, 1937, the city of San Mateo adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance (Ordinance No. 446) which was a revision and reenactment of various prior ordinances relating to the zoning of the city for business and residential purposes. By its terms the city was divided into several districts for the regulation of the construction and maintenance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Reynolds v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Rehfeld v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- MAYOR, & C., OF ALPINE BOROUGH v. BrewsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- City and County of San Francisco v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Donovan v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- City of Des Moines v. LohnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.