Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Davis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to district court, Laramie county. Action by one Davis against one Ketch-um to recover compensation under a verbal contract of agistment. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlaik, J.

This case comes here upon a •writ of error from the district court held in and for the county of Baramie. The facts are that the defendant in error here sued the plaintiff in error here in the court below on an alleged verbal agreement or understanding, under which Davis was to ranch certain cattle belonging to Ketchum, at the price of five dollars per head per annum. Ketchum appeared to the action, and in his amended answer filed a general denial to the first, second, and third causes of action in the plaintiff’s petition contained ; and for a second and further defense pleaded, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MonseauWyoming Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Fein v. TonnWyoming Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Marshall v. RuggWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Boburg v. PrahlWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bissinger & Co. v. WeissWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hester v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API