Legal Opinion

Docherty v. Sadler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1997No. 4-97-0229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

Minor plaintiff, Philip Docherty, was injured when defendant’s dog collided with him. Minor plaintiff’s father brought a complaint under the Animal Control Act (Act) (510 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 1996)). Defendant moved to dismiss, stating minor plaintiff was an "owner” for purposes of the Act and thereby exempt from protection under the Act. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing minor plaintiff was not clearly aware of the risks that ultimately produced the injury and could not have assumed the risk of injury.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Toombs v. City of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Wilcoxen v. PaigeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Steinberg v. PettaIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Eyrich v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carl v. ResnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. VanPlew v. RiccioAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Morgan v. MarquisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. Allendorf v. RedfearnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Scollard v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API