Eyrich v. Johnson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY
The plaintiff, Paul Eyrich, worked as a farmhand for the defendant, Richard Johnson. Paul was bitten by a boar and brought suit against Richard under the Animal Control Act (the Act) (510 ILCS 5/16 (West 1994)). Following depositions, both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Richard. Paul filed a timely notice of appeal. For reasons which follow, we affirm.
I. Facts
Paul was hired by Richard in 1990 to feed and water two to three hogs, and clean their pens. He worked five to six days per week, usually for part of the day. Paul is 46 years old…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Mitchell v. Jewel Food StoresIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Meyer v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Steinberg v. PettaIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Tersavich v. First National Bank & Trust of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ramirez v. Smart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Carl v. ResnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Frost v. Robave, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Docherty v. SadlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- VanPlew v. RiccioAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.