Legal Opinion
United States v. Al-Nashiri
United States Court of Military Commission Review
Decided June 9, 2016No. CMCR 14-001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT
SILLIMAN, Deputy Chief Judge:
On August 11, 2014, the military' commission judge (military judge) dismissed Specification 2 of Charge IV (Terrorism), Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), Charge VIII (Attacking Civilian Objects), and Charge IX (Hijacking or Hazarding a Vessel or Aircraft) (“the charges”) after appel-lee moved to dismiss the charges for lack of jurisdiction. App. 241-45, see id. at 465-71. Appellant filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling. We reverse the military judge’s decision and reinstate the charges.
Statement of the Case
On August 18, 2014,…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-NashirCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Al Bahlul v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2019
- United States v. Al-NashiriSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2018