Mecklenburg County v. Simply Fashion Stores, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge.
Defendant Simply Fashion Stores, Ltd. (“Simply Fashion”) appeals the trial court’s 22 June 2009 order that determined nine legal issues within a condemnation suit by Mecklenburg County (“the county”). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
On 8 December 2000, Simply Fashion entered into a lease agreement (“original lease”) with Freedom Mall Partners (“FMP”) for a period of five years with an option to extend the lease for up to two additional periods of five years each. This original lease included a termination clause, which read, in pertinent part: “In the event the mall is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Harris v. Ray Johnson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Radcliffe v. Avenel Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. CurleeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Head v. Gould Killian Cpa Grp., P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.