Veith v. Xterra Wetsuits, LLC
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, J.*
¶1 This appeal arises from a superior court decision denying a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Parties enter into an enforceable settlement agreement when their intentions are plain and they agree upon the contract’s terms even if one or both of the parties contemplated later execution of a written agreement. Moreover, valid contracts require acceptance. Here, some material terms had not yet been resolved and the defendant had not approved a final settlement. The parties therefore did not have an enforceable settlement agreement. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
¶2…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Morris v. MaksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Stottlemyre v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Zunino v. RajewskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Zunino v. RajewskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Dale Carey v. Matthew BumsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Goebel Design Group, Llc v. Clear Nrg, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In Re The Marriage Of: Saeed Kaley v. Nancy KaleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Ju v. LacombeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.