Legal Opinion

Stevens v. City of Cannon Beach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1992No. 90-2061; CA A68916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs own two vacant lots in the dry sand area of the city of Cannon Beach (city). They applied to defendants city and Oregon Department of Parks & Recreation (department) for permits to build a seawall as part of the eventual development of the lots for motel or hotel use. City and department denied the applications on a number of grounds.

Plaintiffs then brought this inverse condemnation action, asserting that city’s and department’s decisions, and the regulations on which they are based, constitute uncompensated takings of plaintiffs’ property, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Thornton v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. McDonald v. HalvorsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stevens v. City of Cannon BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Stevens v. City of Cannon BeachDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  4. Stevens v. City of Cannon BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API