Legal Opinion

Alford v. Northeast Insurance

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided April 30, 1984No. PCA 82-0655PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ARNOW, Senior District Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s amended motion for order compelling physical examination or the production of fingerprints (doc. 51). Plaintiff has responded and opposes such motion (doc. 52). Plaintiff contends the motion should be denied because his fingerprints are not relevant to the case, because the requested discovery is not of the sort contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and because the requested compulsion “would be invasive of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”

The plaintiff’s fingerprints are relevant to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re John A. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Zalatuka v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilstein v. San Tropai Condominium Master Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  2. Harris v. Athol-Royalston Regional School District CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. Harris v. Athol-Royalston Regional School District CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  4. Nalco Chemical Co. v. Hydro Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API