Legal Opinion

Wilstein v. San Tropai Condominium Master Ass'n

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 7, 1999No. 98 C 6211PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Matthew Wilstein (‘Wilstein” or “Plaintiff’), moves this Court pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to compel Defendants San Tropai Condominium Master Association (“Master Association”), and San Tropai Building II Condominium Association (“Building II Association”) (collectively referred to as “San Tropai” or “the Associations”) to answer deposition questions regarding board meetings held in executive session. Plaintiff also moves this Court to compel the submission of handwriting…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. McCook Metals L.L.C. v. Alcoa Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. North Pacifica, LLC v. City of PacificaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  5. Jones v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API