Fort Pitt Real Est. v. Schaefer Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
G-awthkop, J.,
Defendants appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession entered against them on their bond accompanying a mortgage should not be opened.
The following facts are undisputed: The Fort Pitt Real Estate Company, a corporation, entered into a contract with defendants to build a house on a lot owned by the latter for an agreed consideration. Oh July 15, 1927, when there was due and owing to the company under the contract a balance of $1,045, although the construction of the house had not been completed, it notified defendants that it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gunster v. Scranton Illuminating, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Dominion Trust Co. v. HildnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Ashton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Hutchison v. GillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Gleneagles Inv. Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States National Bank v. DrabishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Harrison v. Galilee Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Quigley v. Breyer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Standard Furnace Co. v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.