Legal Opinion

United States National Bank v. Drabish

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 136 and 144PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

These two appeals were taken from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession entered against defendants on their judgment note should not be opened.

*171On December 18,1953 tbe defendants, John Drabish and Verdine Drabish, entered into and signed a written contract for the installation of a heating system in their home by the General Distributing Company. The defendants did not have the means to pay for the improvement in cash and therefore made a written application to the United States National Bank in Johns-town (hereinafter called “bank”) to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ervin v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Standard Furnace Co. v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Fort Pitt Real Est. v. Schaefer Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Smith v. LenchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Cheltenham National Bank v. SnellingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fidelity Trust Co. v. GardinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API