United States National Bank v. Drabish
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
These two appeals were taken from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession entered against defendants on their judgment note should not be opened.
*171On December 18,1953 tbe defendants, John Drabish and Verdine Drabish, entered into and signed a written contract for the installation of a heating system in their home by the General Distributing Company. The defendants did not have the means to pay for the improvement in cash and therefore made a written application to the United States National Bank in Johns-town (hereinafter called “bank”) to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ervin v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Standard Furnace Co. v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Fort Pitt Real Est. v. Schaefer Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Watt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Smith v. LenchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Cheltenham National Bank v. SnellingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. GardinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.