Legal Opinion

Standard Furnace Co. v. Roth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1931No. Appeal 216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an appeal from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession entered against defendants on their judgment note should not be opened.

On April 17, 1926, the legal plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the legal plaintiff was to install in defendants ’ house a certain specific type of heating furnace for the sum of $400, payable as follows: $22.23 on September 1, 1926, and the balance by judgment note due and payable in seventeen equal monthly installments of $22.23 each, beginning October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Camp of Penna. of Patriotic Sons of America v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Ashton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Janes v. BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cheltenham National Bank v. SnellingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. GardinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. United States National Bank v. DrabishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Stevwing v. Western Pennsylvania National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Universal Credit Co. v. EnyartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API