Standard Furnace Co. v. Roth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
This is an appeal from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment by confession entered against defendants on their judgment note should not be opened.
On April 17, 1926, the legal plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the legal plaintiff was to install in defendants ’ house a certain specific type of heating furnace for the sum of $400, payable as follows: $22.23 on September 1, 1926, and the balance by judgment note due and payable in seventeen equal monthly installments of $22.23 each, beginning October…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Camp of Penna. of Patriotic Sons of America v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Ashton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Janes v. BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Robertson v. Hay ex rel. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cheltenham National Bank v. SnellingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. GardinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- United States National Bank v. DrabishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Stevwing v. Western Pennsylvania National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Universal Credit Co. v. EnyartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.