Legal Opinion

Borgerding v. Mumolo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1957No. Civ. 17508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment and decree of the Superior Court of Alameda County which determined that appellant and respondent are the owners in joint tenancy of certain real property and are entitled to a partition and sale thereof. Appellant Domeniek Mumolo and respondent Mildred A. Borgerding were married in February 1946, and separated in June 1954. The final decree of divorce rendered on January 25, 1956, disposed of the property of the parties, but left unmentioned the two parcels of real property involved in this suit initiated by the respondent. Parcel One is a lot…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donovan v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Crook v. CrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Pruyn v. WatermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Donlon v. DonlonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Abbett Electric Corp. v. StorekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API