Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Wolpe

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1966No. Civ. 597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint for damages based upon express fraud. (Civ. Code, §§ 1572, 3294.) The complaint alleged that the defendants, Wolpe, Volpe and Reed, owned a business consisting of the Club Caravan bar and hotel located in a building in Indio, and that defendant, Paul Krampe, was the agent and broker of the defendant-sellers of the business (in accordance with a request contained in plaintiffs’ pretrial statement, an amendment to paragraph IV of the complaint was later made to the effect that Krampe was agent for both the sellers and the buyers); that before the sale, and to induce…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Guthrie v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Bezaire v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Mezerkor v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API