Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. Department of Justice

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 5, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00762Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REFUGIO CARRILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00762-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSING 13 v. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY 16 DAYS 17 18 Refugio Carrillo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action 19 pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388 20

(1971), which provides a remedy for violation of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API