Legal Opinion

Lamey v. Masciotra

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1969No. Civ. 33426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, Acting P. J.

Antonio Masciotra appeals from a judgment for damages for forcible entry and detainer -awarded by the trial court in favor of plaintiff Elizabeth Mary Lamey against Antonio Masciotra, Rose L. Diyorio and Pasquellina Raessler, both individually and as co-trustees of the estate of Michele Masciotra, deceased.

Appellant’s sole contention, that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s determination that the lessors unlawfully entered and retained possession of the premises, is without merit.

Masciotra, Diyorio and Raessler, both individually and as co-trustees of the estate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Horton-Howard v. PaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Haydell v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Kassan v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Palm Property Investments, LLC v. YadegarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Liebovich v. ShahrokhkhanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API