Legal Opinion

Brock v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 13, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LONG, P.J.A.D.

On this appeal, petitioner, Arthur Brock, challenges the dismissal of the Workers’ Compensation claim he filed against respondent, Public Service Electric & Gas Co. (PSE & G). The compensation judge based the dismissal on N.J.S.A 34:15-33 which provides that a petitioner must:

give the employer written notice or claim that the employee has contracted a compensable occupational disease, which notice to be effective must be given within a period of five months after the date when the employee shall have ceased to be subject to exposure to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Panzino v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass FoundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Jacobitti v. JacobittiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brock v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Brock v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELEC. & GASNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. State v. HackettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API