State v. Hackett
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
STEINBERG, J.A.D.,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion that reverses defendant’s conviction for third-degree endangering the welfare of a child. The majority concludes that the State did not present any evidence that defendant’s conduct would tend to impair or debauch the morals of a child as is required to convict under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a). Like its predecessor, N.J.S.A. 2A:96-3, the statute is designed to protect children under the age of sixteen. State v. White, 105 N.J.Super. 234, 236, 251 A.2d 766 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 54…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Jacobitti v. JacobittiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Brock v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.