City of Panhandle v. Byrd
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Hickman
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
Defendant in error J. H. Byrd will be called plaintiff and plaintiff in error City of Panhandle will be called defendant. In the trial court judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against the defendant for damages for personal injuries and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that judgment. 77 S. W. (2d) 904.
Plaintiff and one W. E. Wright were engaged in doing some work on unpaved streets in the City of Panhandle. The equipment used by them was a. tractor operated by the foreman Wright and a grader operated by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ostrom v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Wichita Falls v. MauldinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Texas Utilities Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- City of Wichita Falls v. SullivanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- City of Panhandle v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Pearson v. DohertyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. SturgeonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.