Legal Opinion
Gadbury v. Ray
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1959No. Civ. 6017PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Carolyn Ann Gadbury, individually, and Hazel Gadbury, by her guardian ad litem, Harold T. Gadbury, brought this action against defendants and respondents Harold James Ray and Elmer Ray, for damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles at the intersection of County Road Number 92 and Avenue 320, in Tulare County, about 4:30 p.m. on January 13, 1957.
Plaintiffs were guests in a 1950 two-door Chevrolet automobile owned and driven by James Gadbury, brother of Hazel Gadbury, who later married plaintiff Carolyn Ann Bray. This…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Sherry Ex Rel. Sherry v. AsingHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hayslip v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Van Pelt v. CarteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.