Legal Opinion

State v. Elisondo

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 17209PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is a review of the decision of the Court of Appeals (State v. Elisondo, 112 Idaho 815, 736, P.2d 867 (1987), in which appellant Elisondo’s conviction for aggravated battery was affirmed. The dispositive issue here is the admission at trial of the preliminary hearing testimony of an eyewitness to the crime. Prior to 1981 the decisions of this Court prohibited the admission of such preliminary hearing testimony. In 1981 the then constituted Court overruled those prior decisions in State v. Mee, 102 Idaho 474, 632 P.2d 663 (1981) and held that the admission of such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. LinnIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Freeman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Keefe v. Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. State v. Gary L. SchallIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. FisherIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. Kyle Alan RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Lyon v. Amoco Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API