Legal Opinion

City of South Gate v. Los Angeles Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1986No. B016340PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants City of South Gate, Carmen Cordero, Amelia Me Bride and John Trujillo (appellants) appeal from a superior court judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate against defendant and respondent Los Angeles Unified School District (District).

Because the project undertaken by the District which resulted in a pupil attendance boundary adjustment (boundary adjustment) is not covered by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the trial court did not err in finding the District was not required to prepare an environmental impact report…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. McQueen v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. East Peninsula Education Council, Inc. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API