Legal Opinion
Chicago Bridge & Iron Works v. Sabin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 1924No. 14789PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was originally instituted by E. S. Sabin (who will hereinafter be called complainant) filing his claim with the State Industrial Commission, for compensation for injuries received while in the employ of the plaintiff in error, who will hereinafter be designated “respondent.”
From the claim filed it appears claimant was employed by .respondent, at Bristow, Okla., and on July 20, 1922, he was unloading rivets from a wagon and was • injured by reason of a box of rivets slipping, and his claim alleges “his hip was dislocated; spine injured, and ligaments torn,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- St. Joseph Mining Co. v. PettittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- White Oak Refining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Rodius v. Coeur D'Alene Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- EL Mendenhall Company v. KellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.