Legal Opinion

U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1926No. 16091PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is a proceeding to review an award made by the Industrial Commission on December 19, 1924. The claimant, W. Dixon, was injured on the 21st day of May, 1924, while in the employment of the Lucky Seven Mining Company; the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company being the insurance carrier.

It appears from the record that claimant was injured by the falling upon him of rocks and dirt, and that he received a scalp wound, arid that he was given hospital and medical attention, and that his compensation began on the 26th day of May, 1924, at the rate of $17.31 per week. Dixon was advised by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Mining Co. v. PettittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Chicago Bridge & Iron Works v. SabinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Bales Bros. Sand Co. v. State Indus. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brigham Young University v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rodius v. Coeur D'Alene Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. PollockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API