Legal Opinion

Granger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1988No. 52887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of robbery in the first degree of Nancy Rixman. He was found by the court to be a dangerous offender and was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, we affirmed. State v. Granger, 680 S.W.2d 258 (Mo.App.1984).

Movant filed this Rule 27.26 motion, alleging his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel. He alleged his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to subpoena a police officer whose testimony would have impeached the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. DegraffenreidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API