Legal Opinion
Kelsey Wheel Co. v. Universal Rim Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1924No. Nos. 3894, 3895PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
This was an infringement suit, brought in the court below by the Rim Company against the Wheel Company, alleging infringement of two patents, granted to the plaintiff May 5, 1914, being, respectively, No. 1,095,771, upon the Anglada application, and No. 1,095,776, upon the Baker application — both pertaining to automobile wheels and demountable rims. Claims 1, 4, 6, and 7,-of the Anglada patent are said to be infringed. They are given in the margin.1 The District Court held that these four claims were valid and infringed, and dircted the usual injunction and accounting;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Permutit Co. v. WadhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Michigan Carton Co. v. Sutherland Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Wagenhorst v. Hydraulic Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Diamond Power Specialty Corporation v. Bayer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.