Legal Opinion
Wagenhorst v. Hydraulic Steel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1928No. 4804PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Infringement suit on the Wagenhorst patent, No. 1,509,-382, issued September 23, 1924, upon a demountable rim for automobile wheels. The patent was based upon a divisional application, filed December 21, 1923, in the course of prosecuting an original application, filed April 2, 1921. The District Court dismissed the bill because he thought the patent invalid, both for lack of invention and because of delay in filing the divisional application.
Since, if the latter reason were sound, the case might well be affirmed oh that ground without attention to the former • reason,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
- King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Refrigerated Dispensers, Inc., Diamond Ice MacHine Company, and the Diamond CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.