Legal Opinion · Dissent

Podrat v. Oberndorff

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9093Published

1Dissent

CURTIS, J., Dissenting.

I dissent. There are two distinct and separate methods provided by the Civil Code for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage, one “in the manner and upon the notice prescribed by the title on ‘pledge’ ” and the other “by proceedings under the Code of Civil Pro cedure” (Civ. Code, sec. 2967). The method of foreclosure in the manner and upon the notice prescribed by the title on pledge is a short and summary proceeding, and is one in which the services to be performed by an attorney are very simple, and consequently the charges of such attorney would be small. On the other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brickell v. BatchelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Walker v. KillianSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  5. Boob v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API