Brickell v. Batchelder
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Twenty-third District Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Thoenton, J.:
This is an appeal prosecuted by defendants from a judgment of foreclosure in an action brought on several notes and mortgages executed to secure their payment. The notes are four and the mortgages three in number, and are all set forth in hcec verba in the complaint.
It is contended on behalf of appellants that the action was prematurely brought; that when it was instituted nothing was due, at least on the note and mortgage of first of June, 1874. In the discussion of this contention, our attention is called to the following matters which are disclosed by the record. The note…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stow v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Williams v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- King v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Bank of San Luis Obispo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Parry v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Phelps v. MayersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. San Joaquin Agricultural Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Union Central Life Insurance v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Garst v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.