Legal Opinion
Stephen Z. Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1974No. 72-2178PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing appellants’ action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.
Appellants, purporting to sue on behalf of themselves and a class of persons similarly situated, filed this action in 1971 in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, against 26 named defendants, 18 of which were alleged to be state chartered savings and loan associations and 8 of which — the present appellees — are federally chartered savings and loan associations. The complaint challenged the validity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rettig v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Boston v. Carol S. Greenwald, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.