Legal Opinion

In re Constitutionality of the Confidential Intermediary Statute, Tomlinson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 26, 1993No. Nos. 92SA107, 92SA136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an appeal from an order of the Juvenile Court for the City and County of Denver declaring the Confidential Intermediary Statute, sections 19-5-301 to -304, 8B C.R.S. (1992 Supp.), unconstitutional.1 The appellants, Karen Jeanne Tomlinson (Tom-linson) and Robert Sean Wood (Wood), assert that the juvenile court did not have judicial authority to review the constitutionality of the statutory provisions and could not sua sponte find that the Confidential Intermediary Statute was unconstitutional. We agree. We reverse the ruling of the juvenile court and remand with directions to appoint a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. deKoevend v. Board of Education of West End School District RE-2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. People v. LybargerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Barnes v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CITY & CTY.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. Ward Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Trinidad School District No. 1 v. Lopez Ex Rel. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API