Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Brown
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff had given to the defendant a chattel mortgage on a mare used for racing purposes and afterward put her in possession of a third party, giving to him the following writing:
*660“For value received in cash of C. E. McKillopp in the sum of $105.00, I agree to give and deliver to him to keep and to hold the black mare, ‘Minnie H.’ with the privilege of buying her back within the next thirty days for $115.00 and feed bill.
“J. E. Marshall.”
Under these circumstances the defendant caused the arrest of the plaintiff on a charge of larceny by bailee. Upon his discharge by the magistrate before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Maxwell v. BollesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Sayres v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Oregon Pottery Co. v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Drake v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hayes v. OgleOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Ritchie v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Bowles v. CreasonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Lucas v. KaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1931