Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The plaintiff had given to the defendant a chattel mortgage on a mare used for racing purposes and afterward put her in possession of a third party, giving to him the following writing:

*660“For value received in cash of C. E. McKillopp in the sum of $105.00, I agree to give and deliver to him to keep and to hold the black mare, ‘Minnie H.’ with the privilege of buying her back within the next thirty days for $115.00 and feed bill.
“J. E. Marshall.”

Under these circumstances the defendant caused the arrest of the plaintiff on a charge of larceny by bailee. Upon his discharge by the magistrate before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Maxwell v. BollesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sayres v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Oregon Pottery Co. v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drake v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hayes v. OgleOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ritchie v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bowles v. CreasonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lucas v. KaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API