Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Ogle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was instituted against defendants J. H. Ogle, A. B. Smith Motor Co., H. C. Mueller and Mrs. H. C. Mueller for injuries suffered by plaintiff in a collision between an automobile in which she was riding and one driven by Mrs. Mueller.

At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant A. B. Smith Motor Co. moved for and was granted a directed verdict against the plaintiff. Thereafter the case proceeded against the defendants H. C. Mueller and Mrs. H. C. Mueller and verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered.

In order to connect the defendant A. B.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Goltra v. PenlandOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sayres v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Blue v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McKay v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Mogul Transportation Co. v. LarisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. South Seattle Auto Auction, Inc. v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API