Legal Opinion

Oregon Pottery Co. v. Kern

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action by the Oregon Pottery Company against Daniel Kern. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in an action brought to recover the value of a scow leased to the defendant, and lost while being used by him. The complaint avers that the loss occurred through the negligence and carelessness of the defendant and his employes, while the defense is that it was due to defective construction, by reason of which the scow was unfit for the uses for which it was hired. On the trial, A. M. Smith, vice-president and manager of plaintiff, was called as a witness, and testified in its behalf, among other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Maxwell v. BollesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sayres v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Whitney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Haight v. KimbarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Farmers' National Bank v. WoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API